Pest Control and Herbs

April 22, 2003 - 11:34

Because herbs are considered consumable food crops, chemical applications to them are heavily regulated. But are pest control materials harmful to greenhouse-grown herbs?

Herbs are used throughout the United States for culinary and
medicinal purposes. Total sales of culinary herbs were $30.9 million in 1998.
The annual retail sales of medicinal herbs in the United States in 1994 was
$1.6 billion and nearly $4.0 billion in 1998. Popular herbs grown in
greenhouses include basil (Ocimum basilicum), chives (Allium schoenoprasum),
dill (Anethum graveolens), lavender (Lavandula angustifolia), mint (Mentha
sp.), parsley (Petroselinum crispum), rosemary (Rosmarinus officinalis), sage
(Salvia officinalis), scented geraniums (Pelargonium sp.) and thyme (Thymus
vulgaris). Similar to other greenhouse-grown crops, herbs are susceptible to a
diversity of insect and mite pests, including aphids, whiteflies, thrips,
fungus gnats and spider mites. The number of pest control materials registered
for herbs, however, is limited because of liability and the fact that herbs are
considered a minor or specialty crop.

Pest control materials registered for use on herbs are
generally considered "biorational" because these materials are less
toxic to workers, have short residual properties and have minimal environmental
contamination. These materials also have a narrow spectrum of pest activity and
generally take longer to kill pests. Although some "biorational"
insecticides are registered for use on herbs, these materials may not have been
tested on all herb species or on plants at different maturities. Currently,
only a minimal amount of information is available on the phytotoxicity of these
insecticides to herbs.

Greenhouse managers need information on which insecticides
are safe to apply to herbs because any phytotoxic effects may limit the use of
these registered materials, thus making it difficult to manage insect and mite
pests. Furthermore, these materials cannot leave unsightly residues or cause
tissue discoloration, which would reduce the market value of herbs. The
objective of this study was to determine if certain pest control materials are
phytotoxic to a select group of commonly grown herb species at two different
growth stages.

Materials and Methods

A greenhouse study, divided into two experiments and
replicated over two growing seasons, was conducted at H. M. Buckley and Sons,
Inc., Springfield, Ill. The first experiment was conducted from October 1999
through February 2000. The second experiment was conducted from March 2001
through April 2001. Within each experiment, there were two treatment groups
with four treatments and an untreated check for all herb species. In experiment
one, both groups were done consecutively because of space restrictions at the
greenhouse facility. As a result, the first experiment was conducted over a
longer time period (five months). In experiment two, both treatment groups were
conducted simultaneously. Herbs used for the studies were five- and
nine-week-old plants of Spanish lavender (Lavandula stoechas), oregano
(Origanum vulgare 'Santa Cruz'), rosemary (Rosmarinus officinalis),
St.-John's-wort (Hypericum perforatum 'Topaz'), wolly thyme (Thymus vulgaris
'Wolly') and nutmeg thyme (Thymus vulgaris 'Nutmeg'). These herbs were selected
for the study because they are widely grown by greenhouse operations and they
are  popular with customers.

For each experiment, five- and nine-week-old plants were
started from cuttings taken from stock plants. After rooting, cuttings were
potted into 4-inch, plastic containers. The growing medium used for the study
consisted of 30 percent bark, 30 percent peat, 20 percent medium vermiculite
and 20 percent perlite. Plants were fertilized using a constant liquid feed
program with 20-8.3-8.8 (N:P:K) at 200 ppm. Plants were placed in a glass
greenhouse (521/2 x 17 feet) on four raised benches (12 x 5 feet) in a
completely randomized design. There were five treatments each with five replications
for each herb species and age class, for a total of 600 plants (100 plants for
each species). Plants were grown under natural daylight conditions with
temperatures between 68 and 82° F.

The insecticide treatments and rates for the first group
were Beauveria bassiana Strain GHA (Botanigard) at 32 fl.oz. per 100 gal.,
Pyrenone at 25 oz. per 100 gal., Azatin at 16 fl.oz. per 100 gal., or
insecticidal soap at 2 gal. per 100 gal. The insecticide treatments and rates
for the second group were Cinnamite at 85 fl.oz. per 100 gal. or 64 fl.oz. per
100 gal., Ultrafine spray oil at 8 gal. per 100 gal., or hot pepper wax at 50
gal. per 100 gal. Both groups had an untreated check that received no
treatment. The insecticides used in this study were selected because they are
or were registered for herbs in greenhouse production systems. The rates used
were based on manufacturer label recommendations for herbs. All insecticides
were sprayed to run-off with a 9.5-L capacity hand pump sprayer.

Three applications of each treatment were made at seven-day
intervals, with temperatures during the applications ranging from 64-82° F
for the first experiment and 73-77° F for the second experiment. The
outdoor weather conditions during insecticide applications were generally overcast.
Plants were watered regularly to minimize plant stress, as environmental
conditions, such as low air speed or high relative humidity, and cultural
stresses may predispose plants to phytotoxicity. In addition, all spray
applications were performed in the morning so that any phytotoxic effects were
due directly to the insecticides. A numerical phytotoxicity rating scale from
0-3 (0 = no visible injury; 1 = light injury, 25 percent foliar injury, no
influence on marketability; 2 = moderate injury, 50 percent foliar injury,
reduced market quality; and 3 = complete foliar injury, more than 75 percent
foliar injury, not marketable) was used to describe the extent of phytotoxicity
from the insecticide treatments. This numerical rating scale is similar to the one
used for evaluating phytotoxicity on chrysanthemums. Typical phytotoxic plant
injury on herbs was a marginal leaf burn (necrosis). Visual evaluations were
conducted seven days after the final insecticide treatment. Plants were
individually evaluated for phytotoxicity.

Results and Discussion

In experiment one, Pyrenone, insecticidal soap and both
rates of Cinnamite were significantly more phytotoxic than the other treatments
and the untreated check (See Table 1, above). The high rate of Cinnamite (85 fl.oz.
per 100 gal.) had a significantly higher phytotoxicity rating than the lower
rate (64 fl.oz. per 100 gal.). Botanigard, Azatin, hot pepper wax and UltraFine
spray oil were not phytotoxic to any of the herb species tested.

Results from experiment two were similar to experiment one,
with the same four treatments causing significantly more phytotoxicity than the
other treatments and the control. Although plants treated with hot pepper wax
and UltraFine spray oil exhibited minor phytotoxic symptoms, they were not
significantly different from the control (See Table 2, page 23).

Despite the phytotoxic effects from some of these pest
control materials, new growth that emerged following the treatments appeared to
overcome the initial injury. As a result, plants at the conclusion of the study
were still saleable, as determined subjectively by the herb production manager.
This type of response has occurred with other pesticides such as
acaricides/miticides where reductions in stomatal openings caused by the phytotoxic
effects were temporary. No significant effect could be attributed to the age of
the plants when they were treated.

A possible reason why the tested insecticides did not harm
most of the herb types is because the plants possess a waxy or thick leaf cuticle,
which may have protected them. This may be due to the physiological nature of
the leaf surface. Of all the herb types, St.-John's-wort demonstrated the
highest sensitivity to the insecticides, especially to both rates of Cinnamite.
This may be because St.-John's-wort has a thinner leaf cuticle compared to the
other herb types.

Initial research with Cinnamite has shown that it was
phytotoxic to poinsettia, Euphorbia pulcherrima. However, it was noted that
this might be due to a formulation problem and not a direct effect of the
active ingredient. In those studies, no phytotoxicity was demonstrated on
rosemary and thyme at 0.25 percent Cinnamite; however, 0.50 percent Cinnamite
was phytotoxic to thyme. As a result, the rate of Cinnamite for use on herbs
has been lowered.

Although oils generally have a higher probability of causing
phytotoxicity, this was not the case in this study. For example, UltraFine
spray oil, which was one of the treatments in this study, has demonstrated
safety to flowers and fruit.

This study demonstrated that several registered insecticides
were phytotoxic to certain herbs. However, the overall effects were not
significant enough to reduce market quality and salability. Furthermore, most
tested insecticides showed no chronic phytotoxic effects. These insecticides
are useful for controlling pests on herbs because they have short residual
activity, which minimizes any potential effects from spray residues. The
information produced from this study will help greenhouse managers when
selecting pest control materials to manage insects and mites on herbs.

About The Author

Raymond Cloyd is assistant professor, extension specialist in Ornamental Entomology/Integrated Pest Management at the University of Illinois Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Sciences. He may be reached by phone at (217) 244-7218 or E-mail at rcloyd@uiuc.edu. Nina Cycholl is greenhouse grower/researcher at H. M. Buckley and Sons, Inc. She may be reached by phone at (217) 546-9350.

Leave A Comment

  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options

By submitting this form, you accept the Mollom privacy policy.