The XY System, Part II
The ultimate piece of automation for labor savings and system integration.
My previous article (June 2003 GPN) described a new piece of
automation recently put into operation: the XY system. The specific growing range
I described as an example was a new 17-acre facility, and the XY system enables
all movement of material in and out of the greenhouse to be operated by one
person. I suspect many people were skeptical of the applicability of such a
system to the U.S. market. After all, how many growers are in a position to
build a new 17-acre range?
The reality is that even though few growers ever entertain a
project of that magnitude, the XY concept is applicable to much smaller
projects. A manager planning for the growth of his 5- to 6-acre operation would
probably find the system affordable and justifiable. For growers who wish to
automate existing operations, variations and hybrids of the system are very
feasible. A system similar to that described in my previous article could be
installed in a new 6-acre range for less than $3.50 per square foot. And the
system, which works in conjunction with overhead watering, does not require
concrete floors, which themselves often cost $3.50 per square foot. We are not
talking about a prohibitively expensive system.
Some More Details
Let's start by reviewing the XY System in more detail and
look at some optional components.
Placing and removing.
The core of the system is a pick and place unit that places and removes
material from greenhouse bays (the Y direction). The unit is driven by an
operator and can selectively pick anywhere in each bay. This unit in our
example was sized to pick 48 carriers or approximately 440 sq.ft. of material
at capacity. Its size coincided with the 30-foot width of the greenhouse bays.
It rides into the bays on steel rails, which eliminate the need for a concrete
floor. For a 6-acre range, a pick and place unit would cost less than $1 per
square foot, which will vary somewhat with size of operation.
Other options are available to perform the pick and place
function. Small overhead cranes can and are being used in both new and existing
facilities. These cranes can ride on the same rails as booms, provided the
rails and greenhouse are designed to handle the load. Two people would normally
be required to move the crane from bay to bay. Most recently constructed
greenhouses have sufficient under-gutter height to accommodate cranes. Both the
cost and the capacity of these systems are typically less than the unit
described above. Cranes normally select one carrier per cycle, though carriers
will normally be larger than those described above (a bench with a crane, a
flat with an XY). Consequently, crane systems will have somewhat less
flexibility than XYs, even though it is still easy to select material from
anywhere in the bay.
Moving. The second
element in the system is the mechanism to move material to and from the
headhouse and shipping area (the X direction). In new XY systems, this is
accomplished by a transport robot that rides on a concrete transport aisle, is
electrically powered and requires no operator. The cost of one of these shuttle
cars is approximately the same as the pick and place unit. The shuttle unit is
also used to move the pick and place unit from bay to bay. More than one
shuttle may be needed to maximize the capacity of the pick and place unit.
Many U.S. growers have justifiable concerns about unmanned
robots in the workplace. The new XYs do require a very wide transport aisle,
which can be planned in a new operation but is not viable in an existing
operation. However, other options are available. 1) In the simplest scenarios,
movement in the X direction can be accomplished by traditional means such as a
train of carts or trailers; 2) the shuttle car could be operated by a person;
3) the size of the shuttle car could be reduced to accommodate narrower
transport aisles, though most newer greenhouse ranges have transport aisles
wide enough to accommodate a shuttle car; 4) capacity may be reduced and still
be more than adequate for a smaller range and 5) if benches are used as a
carrier, traditional powered or unpowered transport lines could be used to
perform the function of the shuttle car. Again, every decision made with regard
to the shuttle device must be integrated with all other elements of the system.
Holding. The third
element of any XY system is the carrier or the actual device holding the flats,
packs or pots. Carriers, such as the ones in the example we've been using, can
be specially designed with a number of features. They can be made to the same
size as cart shelves, designed to work in conjunction with flood floors,
designed to stack on a traditional cart base and serve double duty as shipping
carts (which costs less than $1.75 per square per foot), etc. The only
requirement is that the carrier must be designed to be easily picked up by the
hooks on the pick and place unit. As an example, palletized benches can serve
as carriers if the extrusions are designed to allow pickup by an overhead
fourth element of any system is the means by which the plant material is
transferred from the transport into the headhouse or shipping area. In a
totally automated system, this is done robotically. However, it can be done
easily by more traditional means. This article is intended to concentrate on
operations in the greenhouse itself, so I will not go into detail.
Systems such as the new XYs can seem very complicated. In
fact, they are complicated because a greenhouse growing operation itself is
complicated. The new 17-acre XY we've been talking about in the past two
columns took two years from concept to startup.
It is impossible to overestimate the need for planning when
considering automation. Much more time should be spent on planning than on
implementation. As I have discussed in many of these articles, every operation
in a greenhouse is related to all other operations. Each individual operation,
when looked at in isolation, may not seem complicated, but when viewed
together, the integration of these operations presents a formidable challenge.
This challenge, however, is not insurmountable and can be met by a methodical
planning process. The result of this planning will be a truly integrated system
that will provide the grower and the consumer the lowest cost and highest
quality plant material.