The Consumers' Response to New Poinsettia Cultivars

March 13, 2012 - 13:01

How did consumers rank the 2012 poinsettia introductions?

Each year the poinsettia breeder companies introduce many new cultivars — see the February issue of GPN for information on the 21 new cultivars from the North American Poinsettia Trials being introduced for 2012.

As a part of these trials, we ask consumers to give us their opinions on the new cultivars, which is useful in gauging how the introductions might perform in the marketplace compared to established cultivars. Currently, in mass-market garden centers, there is a shift toward a greater percentage of reds. However for independent garden centers, novelties are still relatively important and can be used to differentiate themselves from mass markets. The consumer evaluations are particularly helpful to learn which novelties have the strongest appeal.

The consumer surveys were conducted differently at each of the trial locations. At Homewood Nursery in Raleigh, N.C., 35 poinsettia cultivars were selected from the National Trials and displayed in their retail greenhouse from Nov. 19 to Dec. 9, 2011. Customers were asked to select their five favorites without ranking them. Names of the cultivars were not posted and the plants were displayed as one group — not separated by color or type.

At North Carolina State University (NCSU) plants were displayed with names in five categories during the Poinsettia Open House, which takes place indoors under fluorescent lighting (see Table 2). Participants were asked to select their three favorite plants from each of the groups and their overall favorites. At NCSU, several combination containers with different cultivars were also evaluated.

At the University of Florida (UF), the survey was conducted in the greenhouse as a part of the Poinsettia Show and Sale on Dec. 8 and 9, 2011. Specific comparisons were set up (Tables 3 through 7) with four to 10 plants in each group and participants selected their one or three favorites for each group. The majority of participants at each location were women and the number of completed surveys were 532, 189, and 788 at Homewood, NCSU and UF, respectively.

Participants in these surveys are consumers typically interested in new, novel and higher-end plants. Notice that in the Top 10 selections at both Homewood and NCSU (Table 1) the top five cultivars were all either novelties or a non-red color. The preferences shown in these surveys are indicative of customers in less price sensitive markets.
‘Ice Punch’ was the clear outstanding cultivar at all three locations. It has been the leading cultivar in the surveys for three to four years and these results indicate that consumer interest in ‘Ice Punch’ remains very strong. ‘Sparkling Punch’ is new for 2012 and has light pink and white bracts. ‘Premium Ice Crystal’ has become an important commercial novelty cultivar and often receives high ratings in the consumer surveys. Consumers showed stronger interest in ‘Ice Punch’ compared to the other novelties (Tables 4 and 5), which is similar to results for a comparable test in 2010. Also, these results and those at NCSU (Table 2) indicate that consumer demand for ‘Sparkling Punch’ may not be as strong as for ‘Ice Punch’, which is not surprising considering consumer preferences for novelties with some red coloration.

‘Premium Picasso’ (Table 1) was among the top cultivars at Homewood and NCSU. It is frequently compared to ‘Monet Twilight’, often a favorite in past surveys. ‘Monet Early’ is a new cultivar with a similar color pattern. Table 6 shows results for a UF comparison of these cultivars. Cultivars with this color pattern often have considerable variation between plants with different amounts of red. The consumers showed a clear preference for the darker Picasso selection.

NCSU has been doing combination containers with mixed colors, and the consumers’ favorites for this year are listed in Table 2. While two of the combinations are red and white, mixing ‘Ice Punch’ and ‘Sparkling Punch’ is an example of creating a very novel look. Just as with spring crops, poinsettia combinations can be used to create novelty that is not achieved with a single cultivar. For UF’s Poinsettia Show and Sale, students grow a large array of different cultivars in 4-inch pots and combine them in 12-inch terra cotta bowls to create unique, one-of-a-kind containers. They make 120 to 130 units, priced at $40, which generates about 10 percent of their total sales.

For white cultivars, ‘Whitestar’, ‘Premium Polar’ and ‘Polar Bear’ have been among the highest ranked cultivars for the past couple of years. ‘Polly’s Pink’ has been the strongest pink cultivar in the trials, recently. Among marbles there has not been a clear leader the past few years, possibly due to the fact that ‘Marblestar’, still highly popular, has not been in the trials in several years. For jingle bell and glitter types, the strongest cultivars the past two years have been ‘Sonora White Glitter’ and ‘Red Glitter’.

Red is the primary color in all market levels. While consumers can pick a favorite red when asked, they generally like most of the plants. Thus, it is common to see results as shown in Table 3 where not a single cultivar received over 20 percent of the votes. At UF, four plants with different bract sizes and shade of red were compared (Table 7) and over 50 percent of consumers picked the plant with large, bright red bracts. The preference for large bracts is not a surprise. In North America, production for the past 20+ years has been dominated by the dark, bluish red of Freedom and Prestige. We are beginning to see more cultivars with lighter or brighter shades of red and it will be interesting to see if there will be a shift in production towards those shades.

About The Author

Jim Barrett is professor of horticulture at University of Florida and can be reached at jbarrett@ufl.edu. John Dole is professor of horticultural science at North Carolina State University.

Leave A Comment

  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options

By submitting this form, you accept the Mollom privacy policy.